This blog is hosted on Ideas on EuropeIdeas on Europe Avatar


Wrestling With the Challenges of a Qualitative Interview

Photo by Amy Hirschi on Unsplash


If the earlier blog entries (October, November, December and January) covered the thematic scope of the envisaged research project, then this one is dedicated to the complexities of data processing, namely, qualitative interviews, the challenges in analysing the acquired insights. Recently reviewed scholarly remarks on the process tracing and practice tracing most relevant for my research project are put together in a concise manner as the initial point of departure for further mapping of the most optimal ways how to plan, conduct interviews and analyse the acquired insights.

One of the key historically contested aspects of a qualitative approach of semi-structured interviews is the interpretation of certain acquired information according to specific dispositions of the researcher. Both Bourdieu highlights this challenge with a reference to the observations of Pieto that “the meaning of a linguistic element depends at least as much on extra-linguistic as on linguistic factors, that is to say, on the context and situation in which it is used. Everything takes place as if, from among the class of “signifields” abstractly corresponding to a speech sound, the receiver “selected” the one which seems to him to be compatible with the circumstances as he perceives them” (Bourdieu, 1977, p. 25). Similarly, Keukeleire among the three major challenges and limitations of a decentered perspective on the EU foreign policy mentions the “conscious or unconscious filtering out of information that does not resonate with” the researcher’s “own world view” (Keukeleire, 2017). It is a flaw of the analytical capacities witnessed not only among researchers but also among the diplomatic corps (Cornut, 2015, pp. 394, 396).

Another risk identified by Bourdieu is that “the analyst is liable to fall into all the error that flow from tendency to confuse the actor’s point of view with the spectator’s point of view” by asking questions about the practice which seem to the community of practice self-evident, obvious and unquestionable (Bourdieu, 1990, pp. 82-83). Some prior work experience among the analysed circles of experts lessens the likeliness of being prone to the “Mauss problem” (Adler-Nissen et al., 2013, p. 50).

The same complexity of filtering of information applies to the key selected sources of insight – the project managers and their ‘subjectivist bias’ (Adler-Nissen et al., 2013, p. 103). Moreover, Bourdieu rightly indicates also the importance of the situatedness of the offered insight: “the participant is likely to be governed in his actions by several interests, purposes, and sentiments, dependent upon his specific position, which impair his understanding of the total situation […] What is meaningless for an actor playing a specific rȏle may well be highly significant for an observer and analyst of the total system […].” (Bourdieu, 1990, p. 36) Habitus is “the principle of selective perception of the indices tending to confirm and reinforce it rather than transform it […]” (Bourdieu, 1990, p. 64). That is why attention should be paid at the selection stage of invited experts for interviews. In case of the selected scope of the Southern Neighbourhood, the diverse geographical representation might contribute to the richness of the acquired insights. Interviewees perspectives are affected by the subfield and corresponding habitus – institutional and national settings – which shape their judgement.

It should be also added that what matters is not how narrow-minded are the interviewees in comparison to a notional comprehensive picture as “the ‘big T’ truth” (Adler-Nissen, 2016, p. 13). No matter how seemingly narrow or broad their judgements, all of them are valuable as important components which contribute to the construction of the meaning of implicit science diplomacy practices towards the EU Southern Neighbourhood taking place in the context of a “shared, dispersed and disaggregated” sovereignty (Adler-Nissen et al., 2013, p. 182).

The theoretical foundations of practice tracing increases the author’s awareness about the dubious nature of an attempt to capture and dissect the essence of practice since “accounts of practices are interpretations of interpretations” leading to an acknowledgement that “there is no point in trying to show that the practices discussed in a scholarly account correspond exactly to what practitioners do” (Bennett et al., 2015, p. 250). However, such considerations are not discouraging the research project’s author from keeping apace with the latest developments in the policy implementation and theorise these processes or ‘sobjectivise’ by building new ‘experience-distant’ theoretical layer of science diplomacy as a component of the EU structural diplomacy based on the acquired “messy arrays of practice” in the form of ‘experience-near’ insights (Adler-Nissen et al., 2013, p. 50; Bennett et al., 2015, p. 244; Pouliot, 2007).



Adler-Nissen, R. (2016). Towards a Practice Turn in EU Studies: The Everyday of European Integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(1), 87–103. Retrieved from

Adler-Nissen, R., Pouliot, V., Villumsen Berling, T., Guzzini, S., Mérand, F., Forget, A., … Guiraudon, V. (2013). Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. (R. Adler-Nissen, Ed.), The New International Relations Series. London, New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Bennett, A., Checkel, J. T., Jacobs, A. M., Schimmelfennig, F., Waldner, D., Evangelista, M., … Pouliot, V. (2015). Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytical Tool. (A. Bennett & J. T. Checkel, Eds.), Kwalon (Vol. 19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Cornut, J. (2015). To be a diplomat abroad : Diplomatic practice at embassies. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(3), 385–401.

Keukeleire, S. (2017). Decentring the analysis of European foreign policy (2/9): How to decentre? Exploring EU Foreign Policy. Retrieved from

Pouliot, V. (2007). “Sobjectivism”: Toward a Constructivist Methodology. International Studies Quarterly, 51(2), 359–384. Retrieved from



Comments Off on Wrestling With the Challenges of a Qualitative Interview

Recent Articles

Field and Habitus in the European Southern Neighbourhood Context

Published on by | Comments Off on Field and Habitus in the European Southern Neighbourhood Context

Introduction Since science diplomacy is a relatively nascent field of scholarly enquiry, it is worth exploring its capacity to keep in step with other dynamic contemporary theoretical currents which are pre-occupied with the evolution of diplomacy. Science diplomacy holds the potential to induce the practice theory with a broader view of the diverse actors engaged […]

Science Diplomacy Joins the Snowballing Practice Turn

Published on by | Comments Off on Science Diplomacy Joins the Snowballing Practice Turn

Photo by Gabriel Alenius on Unsplash   Introductory Remarks Winter bliss has arrived in Northern Europe which brings not only a festive mood but also an overall intellectual propensity towards certain concepts echoing seasonal scenery. Snowball effect (NB! not snowball sampling) is the one which comes into mind when trying to put into words the continuous reflections on […]

EU Science Diplomacy in the Southern Neighbourhood with a Bourdieusian Twist

Published on by | Comments Off on EU Science Diplomacy in the Southern Neighbourhood with a Bourdieusian Twist

 Photo by Aaron Burden on Unsplash   This blog entry is a follow-up to the research agenda published last month. It presents further details of the research project. It captures the evolving complexity of the research project since the most recent reflections on Bourdieusian influences in the EU studies have encouraged embracing not just one of the overall three taxonomies […]

EUSBSR Should Be Profoundly Transformative

Published on by | Comments Off on EUSBSR Should Be Profoundly Transformative

“In each one of us, in differing degrees, is contained the person we were yesterday, and indeed, in the nature of things it is even true that our past personae predominate in us, since the present is necessarily insignificant when compared with the long period of the past because of which we have emerged in […]

The EU’s Diplomacy for Science in the Southern Neighbourhood: Setting a Research Agenda

Published on by | Comments Off on The EU’s Diplomacy for Science in the Southern Neighbourhood: Setting a Research Agenda

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash   Foreword The outlined science diplomacy research project is presented with a full appreciation of Adler-Nissen’s concise observation that ‘over the last 50 years, European states have come to view their nations as anchored so deeply within the institutions of the EU that their diplomats merge the promotion of national interests with […]

Motivational Quotes For Work

Published on by | Comments Off on Motivational Quotes For Work

Do you have at work one of these lovely collaborative brainstorming boards? I do. Here is my inspirational (inspirational / management) quote. In short, I have taken the liberty to add a new twist to the widely used Altshuler’s quote. The impressive photo of F-22 was retrieved from Defense Industry Daily. In case you find […]

EU’s Conundrum of Strategies: Is There an Orderly Jigsaw on the Horizon?

Published on by | Comments Off on EU’s Conundrum of Strategies: Is There an Orderly Jigsaw on the Horizon?

The grandness of the EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy lies in its potential to render the existing conundrum of various EU strategies into a more orderly set of strands with a clear vision regarding their mutually complementary role. Strategies are inbuilt in EU’s genome. These policy documents define EU’s aims, approaches in […]

UACES and Ideas on Europe do not take responsibility for opinions expressed in articles on blogs hosted on Ideas on Europe. All opinions are those of the contributing authors.